setup multi-arch build#297
Conversation
|
Hi @morlay, DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using comments are available here. |
|
Known Issue:
$ file lib/mlu/*
lib/mlu/cntopo: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=f4e84ebeefefc76c0dbf925d5b28b3c2318f9342, stripped
lib/mlu/libcndev.so: ELF 64-bit LSB shared object, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, BuildID[sha1]=4e4a1717580ce285e50565322b7a87cf3d3d1422, stripped
lib/mlu/smlu-containerd: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=e3ea08302634487ef73ba64cc55e801d1a085920, with debug_info, not stripped |
4489074 to
927a5ab
Compare
|
/auto-cc |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: morlay The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Morlay <morlay.null@gmail.com>
|
Is there anything wrong with this pr now? |
|
Currently, HAMi images already support multiple architectures. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
to build multi arch images with amd64/arm64
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
no
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
no