rename 'protocol' to 'steps' and 'protocols' to 'tests'#184
Conversation
Both in the external interface (yaml and messages) and in the code
| There is **experimental** support for recording protocols. You can either record | ||
| protocols by passing in the `--record` command line flag, or you can put | ||
| so-called holes into your protocols: | ||
| There is **experimental** support for recording tests. You can either record |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it just occurred to me that this idea might need a bit more explanation. i don't believe there are other similar tools out there that can automatically generate tests for you, so the idea of "recording tests" isn't obvious IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, that's right. This could probably use recording snapshot tests as an analogy.
Do you think that this PR makes the readme worse? If not I would defer your concern to a different issue/PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no i think the change is fine, but using a more common word made it clearer to me that this was confusing. yes, i would defer to a separate PR. i can make a ticket for it.
matthandlersux
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the words "test" and "protocol" have now become meaningless to me because of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_satiation :)
Closes #182.