Subtask of #62
It only seems convenient to ask the users wrap static libraries that go with headers in a framework.
For example in case you have the libMyLibrary.a and a few headers that go with it (like the MagTek library) you can wrap it as:
MyLibrary.framework
├── MyLibrary <- libMyLibrary.a with the "lib" prefix and ".a" extension stripped
└── Headers
├── MyLibrary.h <- An umbrella header that eventually includes ClassA.h and ClassB.h
├── ClassA.h
└── ClassB.h
In any case it seems more convenient to use this convention rather than inventing a home made package.json configuration.
So packed frameworks will be usable in nativescript.
Subtask of #62
It only seems convenient to ask the users wrap static libraries that go with headers in a framework.
For example in case you have the libMyLibrary.a and a few headers that go with it (like the MagTek library) you can wrap it as:
In any case it seems more convenient to use this convention rather than inventing a home made package.json configuration.
So packed frameworks will be usable in nativescript.