Conversation
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTargetBaselineTarget resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoBaseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoRuntime information
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #154 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.65% 91.32% -0.33%
==========================================
Files 9 9
Lines 1222 1234 +12
==========================================
+ Hits 1120 1127 +7
- Misses 102 107 +5
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTargetBaselineTarget resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoBaseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoRuntime information
|
|
Bummer. Looks like they are still useful. I will have to dig deeper to figure out why. |
|
Bizarre. I couldn't replicate the performance difference on my laptop for a couple of test cases. Let's see if the rebase somehow magically fixed something. (Seems unlikely, but still...) |
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTargetBaselineTarget resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoBaseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoRuntime information
|
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTargetBaselineTarget resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoBaseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/ImageFiltering.jl/ImageFiltering.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoRuntime information
|
This addresses "Update usage of OffsetArrays" in #142. It wasn't as ugly as I feared, but a nice cleanup nonetheless.
Do not merge this until we get benchmarks that let us assess the consequences of this change. (#152)