Closed
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
|
Perhaps better to implement |
Member
|
I actually had something similar to this at one point, except it would parenthesize epsilon components for nested dual numbers. I got rid of it in favor of the existing behavior, which I now find much more legible for actual work. I really don't want to go back to drowning in epsilon soup... I appreciate your work here, so sorry to be a downer, but it's probably going to get a 👎 from me unless there are clearer examples of where this pretty printing is more legible than the current pretty printing. |
Collaborator
Author
|
Sounds reasonable. I'm just procrastinating here anyway ;) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With inspiration taking from the complex pretty printing in base:
Will add tests after obligatory bikeshedding :)