Skip to content

Conversation

@jasmith-hs
Copy link
Contributor

Reverts #988

I don't think this is going to be the best solution to solve for this problem.
There are still situations such as #987 which are problematic.

Additionally, this would defer values unnecessarily such as if map.a, if a is primitive, map would still get deferred via this logic.

@jasmith-hs jasmith-hs merged commit 2141364 into master Jan 13, 2023
@jasmith-hs jasmith-hs deleted the revert-988-preserve-identifiers branch January 13, 2023 21:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants