-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
Fix APP-B2Q (3/3): give notification-preferences a distinct path param to avoid reportID collision #94688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix APP-B2Q (3/3): give notification-preferences a distinct path param to avoid reportID collision #94688
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
063ec30
Only throw in createDynamicRoute on a genuine query-param value conflict
MelvinBot b0cf872
Fix APP-B2Q (3/3): give notification-preferences a distinct path param
MelvinBot a9b3d42
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into claude-fixDynamicRout…
MelvinBot File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With this required path segment, URLs generated by the previous version such as
.../notification-preferences?reportID=123no longer match this dynamic route: the dynamic suffix matcher only sees the singlenotification-preferencessegment, but the static suffix was removed and the new linking config requires:notificationReportID. On web, users can still land on those URLs from browser history, bookmarks, or a refresh across deploys, so this turns an existing notification-preferences deeplink into a fallback/not-found route; consider accepting the legacy query-param form while using the new path-param form for new navigations.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think legacy support for old URLs is necessary here, since this is a deeply nested route and isn't commonly used.