Skip to content

fix: update zip code validation when address country changes - #93137

Merged
marcochavezf merged 12 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
nabi-ebrahimi:fix/refresh-zip-validation-after-country-change
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

fix: update zip code validation when address country changes#93137
marcochavezf merged 12 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
nabi-ebrahimi:fix/refresh-zip-validation-after-country-change

Conversation

@nabi-ebrahimi

@nabi-ebrahimi nabi-ebrahimi commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

This change improves address entry for users outside the United States by validating postal codes against the selected country instead of applying a generic or US-focused ZIP code rule. This matters because reimbursement and account setup flows collect addresses across multiple countries, and rejecting valid local postal codes creates unnecessary friction and blocks users from completing setup.

The form now also shows country-specific postal code examples and only uses a numeric keyboard for US ZIP codes. That makes the expected input clearer for international users while preserving the simpler numeric experience for US addresses.

Fixed Issues

$ #90491
PROPOSAL: #90491 (comment)

Tests

  1. Start the Add bank account flow from Workflows or Accounts > Wallet.
  2. On the Owner info page, return to the Address section.
  3. Change the selected country.
  4. Confirm that the hint text updates according to the selected country.
  5. Enter an invalid ZIP/postal code.
  6. Confirm that a validation error is displayed stating that the ZIP/postal code is invalid.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests.

QA Steps

Same as Tests.

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen_Recording_20260610_070422_New.Expensify.Dev.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Recording_20260610_065424.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2026-06-10.at.7.25.33.AM.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-06-10.at.7.00.21.AM.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-06-10.at.6.50.10.AM.mov

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...c/pages/ReimbursementAccount/AddressFormFields.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/libs/ValidationUtils.ts 59.15% <0.00%> (-1.84%) ⬇️
src/components/SubStepForms/AddressStep.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

@nabi-ebrahimi
nabi-ebrahimi marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2026 02:59
@nabi-ebrahimi
nabi-ebrahimi requested review from a team as code owners June 10, 2026 02:59
@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested review from JmillsExpensify and Pujan92 and removed request for a team and JmillsExpensify June 10, 2026 02:59
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team June 10, 2026 02:59

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 5c940e2b3d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +120 to +122
const [countryInEditMode, setCountryInEditMode] = useState<string>(defaultValues?.country ?? CONST.COUNTRY.US);
// When draft values are not being saved we need to relay on local state to determine the currently selected country
const currentlySelectedCountry = shouldSaveDraft ? defaultValues?.country : countryInEditMode;
const currentlySelectedCountry = countryInEditMode || defaultValues?.country;
const zipSampleFormat = ((currentlySelectedCountry ? COMMON_CONST.COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA[currentlySelectedCountry as Country] : undefined) as CountryZipRegex | undefined)?.samples ?? '';

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Derive the displayed country from updated defaults

When defaultValues.country changes after this component has mounted, countryInEditMode keeps its initial value (often US, from the empty initial Onyx value), so currentlySelectedCountry never reflects the loaded/default country unless the user manually changes the selector. In flows with a fixed or asynchronously loaded country, such as the non-USD business address step where shouldAllowCountryChange={false} and the country comes from Onyx, this leaves the postal hint/input mode and the CA-vs-US state/province list stuck on the wrong country.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed this feedback by making countryInEditMode only store a user-selected override so async defaultValues.country updates are reflected.

import type {Country} from '@src/CONST';
import type {TranslationPaths} from '@src/languages/types';
import type {Address} from '@src/types/onyx/PrivatePersonalDetails';

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-3 (docs)

The CountryZipRegex type is defined here and also in src/components/SubStepForms/AddressStep.tsx (line 20). Both types serve the same purpose (typing the shape of COMMON_CONST.COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA entries) but have slightly different fields, which is fragile. Additionally, the inline access pattern COMMON_CONST.COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA[currentlySelectedCountry as Country] as CountryZipRegex duplicates the logic already encapsulated by getCountryZipRegexDetails in AddressStep.tsx.

Extract CountryZipRegex to a single shared location (e.g., a types file or alongside ValidationUtils) and reuse getCountryZipRegexDetails from AddressStep.tsx (or better yet, move it to ValidationUtils) instead of duplicating the lookup logic inline:

// In AddressFormFields.tsx, reuse the shared helper:
import {getCountryZipRegexDetails} from '@libs/ValidationUtils';

const zipSampleFormat = getCountryZipRegexDetails(currentlySelectedCountry as Country)?.samples ?? '';

Reviewed at: 5c940e2 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Pujan92, thank you for the review.
I addressed this by centralizing CountryZipRegex and getCountryZipRegexDetails in ValidationUtils. AddressFormFields now uses the shared helper instead of directly accessing COMMON_CONST.COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA.

samples?: string;
};

function getCountryZipRegexDetails(country?: Country | ''): CountryZipRegex | undefined {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-3 (docs)

getCountryZipRegexDetails and isValidZipCodeForCountry are validation utility functions placed inside a UI component file. The codebase already has isValidZipCode and the formerly-used isValidZipCodeInternational in @libs/ValidationUtils. These new helpers perform the same category of work (zip code validation) and should live alongside them for discoverability, reuse, and consistency.

Move getCountryZipRegexDetails, isValidZipCodeForCountry, and the shared CountryZipRegex type to src/libs/ValidationUtils.ts so both AddressStep.tsx and AddressFormFields.tsx can import them from the same location.


Reviewed at: 5c940e2 | Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Pujan92, thank you for the review.
I moved getCountryZipRegexDetails, isValidZipCodeForCountry, and CountryZipRegex to src/libs/ValidationUtils.ts so the ZIP validation helpers live alongside the existing validation utilities and can be reused by both address components.

@nabi-ebrahimi

nabi-ebrahimi commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @Pujan92, thank you for taking the time to review this.
I checked the full ESLint failure log. The reported no-unsafe-type-assertion errors are coming from tests/unit/ReportSecondaryActionUtilsTest.ts, which is not touched by this PR.

This PR only changes:

src/components/SubStepForms/AddressStep.tsx
src/libs/ValidationUtils.ts
src/pages/ReimbursementAccount/AddressFormFields.tsx

So this looks like a global seatbelt threshold/baseline lint failure rather than an issue introduced by the ZIP validation changes in this PR.

@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 Gentle bump. Thanks!

@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 Friendly bump. Thanks!

@Pujan92

Pujan92 commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I will review today

@Pujan92

Pujan92 commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2026-06-23.at.18.26.21.mov

@Pujan92

Pujan92 commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MelvinBot review

@MelvinBot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review

No correctness bugs in the core logic — the country-aware validation is sound. A few things worth confirming before approving, mostly around an intended behavior change and some now-dead code.

1. Behavior change to confirm (intended, but please verify with product)

For the three NonUSD country‑selector flows (BusinessInfo, BeneficialOwnerInfo, SignerInfo), a non‑US postal code was previously not validated at all (shouldValidateZipCodeFormat was false, which short‑circuited the whole check). After this PR those flows now enforce the country‑specific regex via shouldValidateSelectedCountryZip, which ignores shouldValidateZipCodeFormat. This is exactly the PR's goal, so it's expected — just flagging that users in countries with strict/imperfect regexes could now be blocked where they weren't before.

2. shouldValidateZipCodeFormat is now dead code in the country-selector flows

Since the country path in validate never consults shouldValidateZipCodeFormat (only the else if non‑selector branch does), the prop — and the useState/setShouldValidateZipCodeFormat machinery in SignerInfo and EnterSignerInfo — no longer affects anything in those callers. Recommend removing the now-unused prop/state to avoid confusion. (It still has effect for US‑only flows that have no country selector, via the default true.)

3. Missing unit tests

isValidZipCodeForCountry and getCountryZipRegexDetails have no tests (Codecov flagged the drop). Given this is validation‑critical and the whole PR rides on it, a few cases would be worth adding: US (5‑digit + zip+4), a country with a strict regex (e.g. AD), a country with an empty regex object falling back to the generic regex (e.g. AE), and the empty‑country fallback.

Things I checked that are fine
  • Async/loaded default country (the earlier Codex P2 concern): properly addressed — currentlySelectedCountry is now derived from a live defaultCountry each render, so the hint, input mode, and CA‑vs‑US state list update when defaultValues.country loads async (including shouldAllowCountryChange={false}).
  • No stateful-regex bug: none of the COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA entries nor GENERIC_ZIP_CODE_REGEX use the g flag, so the repeated .test() calls are safe.
  • Error message renders correctly: the hardcoded errorText={... 'bankAccount.error.zipCode' ...} in AddressFormFields is overridden by FormProvider's errorText: errors[inputID] ?? fieldErrorMessage, so the country‑specific incorrectZipFormat message (with samples) is what's actually shown.
  • US consistency: COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA.US.regex (/^[0-9]{5}(?:[- ][0-9]{4})?$/) matches the existing isValidZipCode behavior, so US validation is unchanged.
  • validate dependency array is complete.

🤖 Generated for Pujan92. React with 👍/👎.

@Pujan92

Pujan92 commented Jun 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nabi-ebrahimi could you plz confirm that earlier the zip validation wasn't applied to those screens where shouldValidateZipCodeFormat was false. Is it because of any specific reason?

@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@nabi-ebrahimi could you plz confirm that earlier the zip validation wasn't applied to those screens where shouldValidateZipCodeFormat was false. Is it because of any specific reason?

Hi @Pujan92, thank you for the feedback and for taking the time to review this.

Yes, I confirmed that ZIP/postal code validation was previously skipped on screens where shouldValidateZipCodeFormat was false.

The reason appears to be that the previous validation logic was entirely gated by shouldValidateZipCodeFormat, and some NonUSD flows passed shouldValidateZipCodeFormat={country === CONST.COUNTRY.US}. As a result, those screens validated only US ZIP codes and did not validate postal code formats for other countries.

This PR changes that behavior by applying country-specific validation whenever a country selector is present, allowing non-US postal codes to be validated against COUNTRY_ZIP_REGEX_DATA. My understanding is that this aligns with the goal of refreshing and validating the ZIP/postal code format whenever the selected country changes.

@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Pujan92, Gentle bump. thanks.

@Pujan92 Pujan92 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot
melvin-bot Bot requested a review from marcochavezf June 23, 2026 12:58
@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 Hi, thank you for the review. During testing, I noticed that the ZIP code hint was no longer shown when no country was selected. I have updated the fallback logic so it now uses the US ZIP format when the country is unset, matching the previous behavior.

@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 Hi, I have addressed the conflicts and kept both the latest address validation changes from main and the country-specific ZIP validation changes from this PR. Could you please review when you get a chance? thanks.

@nabi-ebrahimi

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Pujan92, Gentle bump. thanks.

@marcochavezf marcochavezf left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The latest changes LGTM

@marcochavezf
marcochavezf merged commit 4f8b596 into Expensify:main Jun 30, 2026
33 checks passed
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 marcochavezf has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/marcochavezf in version: 9.4.25-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@mitarachim

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@nabi-ebrahimi This PR is failing because of a regression issue #95021

The issue is reproducible in: Web, Android, iOS

Bug7195883_1782854512302.WEB-repro.mp4

@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.4.25-2 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants