[No QA] refactor: extract OptionRow.OnboardingBadge leaf by BartekObudzinski · Pull Request #89914 · Expensify/App

BartekObudzinski · 2026-05-07T13:01:36Z

Explanation of Change

Extracts the FreeTrial onboarding badge into a single-concern OptionRow.OnboardingBadge leaf that self-derives isChatUsedForOnboarding from LHNTooltipContext plus the existing scalar useOnyx(CONCIERGE_REPORT_ID). Drops the corresponding derivation, useOnyx(CONCIERGE_REPORT_ID) subscription, and the onboarding / onboardingPurpose reads from useLHNTooltipContext from OptionRowLHNCore. Part of an OptionRowLHN decomposition series.

Fixed Issues

$ #89954
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

codecov · 2026-05-07T13:10:29Z

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...s/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRowLHNCore.tsx	`96.42% <100.00%> (-0.19%)`	⬇️
...onsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRow/OnboardingBadge.tsx	`87.50% <87.50%> (ø)`
... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

BartekObudzinski · 2026-05-08T08:39:14Z

@codex review

melvin-bot · 2026-05-08T08:39:17Z

@DylanDylann Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-05-08T08:51:29Z

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Can't wait for the next one!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

Open a pull request for review
Mark a draft as ready
Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

…-onboarding-badge # Conflicts: # src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRowLHNCore.tsx

…-onboarding-badge # Conflicts: # Mobile-Expensify

DylanDylann · 2026-05-11T12:48:23Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: HybridApp
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: HybridApp
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

srikarparsi · 2026-05-11T16:41:10Z

@MelvinBot can you please review this PR

MelvinBot · 2026-05-11T16:44:02Z

The refactoring logic is sound — the OnboardingBadge leaf correctly encapsulates its own useLHNTooltipContext + useOnyx(CONCIERGE_REPORT_ID) reads and the isChatUsedForOnboarding check. Two issues:

Dead imports in OptionRowLHNCore.tsx — three imports are now unused after the extraction:
These should be removed.
Import ordering — the OnboardingBadge import on line 28 is placed after Title, breaking alphabetical order. It should come before Title (i.e., between DraftIndicator and Title).

Everything else looks good — the component structure, early return, and displayName convention are all correct.

…-onboarding-badge # Conflicts: # src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRowLHNCore.tsx

melvin-bot · 2026-05-12T08:24:25Z

@mountiny looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

github-actions · 2026-05-12T08:29:11Z

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

OSBotify · 2026-05-12T08:32:39Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

github-actions · 2026-05-12T08:33:47Z

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #89914.

Android 🤖	iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-android-Adhoc-fcf3f8d-bdeb285-fcab5eaf91036b317a01e8ffff36200b8195bf8a/index.html	https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/rock-artifacts/ad-hoc/rock-ios-device-AdHoc-fcf3f8d-bdeb285-21399075bebe10843e109a7d4921dc177bb15ed5/index.html

Web 🕸️
https://89914.pr-testing.expensify.com

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

mountiny · 2026-05-12T08:48:48Z

Not emergency, the checks were green for me

OSBotify · 2026-05-13T07:24:40Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.73-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

iOS

MelvinBot · 2026-05-13T07:25:58Z

No help site changes required.

This PR is a pure internal refactor — it extracts the existing FreeTrial onboarding badge into a dedicated OptionRow.OnboardingBadge leaf component. There are no user-facing behavior changes, no new features, and no UI modifications. The badge renders identically before and after the change.

OSBotify · 2026-05-13T07:55:35Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.3.73-0 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

Bundle Size Analysis (Sentry):

Android
iOS

OSBotify · 2026-05-13T20:57:20Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 9.3.73-4 🚀

platform	result
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅

refactor: extract OptionRow.OnboardingBadge leaf

1a1e7be

melvin-bot Bot assigned BartekObudzinski May 7, 2026

BartekObudzinski marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2026 08:39

BartekObudzinski requested review from a team as code owners May 8, 2026 08:39

melvin-bot Bot requested review from DylanDylann and JmillsExpensify and removed request for a team May 8, 2026 08:39

melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team May 8, 2026 08:39

BartekObudzinski mentioned this pull request May 8, 2026

[Due for payment 2026-05-20] [Improvement] Decompose OptionRowLHN into compound component family #89946

Closed

12 tasks

BartekObudzinski added 2 commits May 11, 2026 09:22

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into refactor/option-row…

d2442cf

…-onboarding-badge # Conflicts: # src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRowLHNCore.tsx

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into refactor/option-row…

4bb25fe

…-onboarding-badge # Conflicts: # Mobile-Expensify

DylanDylann approved these changes May 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot Bot requested a review from srikarparsi May 11, 2026 12:48

srikarparsi previously approved these changes May 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into refactor/option-row-onboarding-badge

d986bc9

srikarparsi dismissed their stale review via d986bc9 May 11, 2026 16:38

Remove unused import

8a5508b

srikarparsi and others added 3 commits May 12, 2026 02:57

Merge branch 'main' into refactor/option-row-onboarding-badge

350b57a

Remove unused import

299e220

chore: remove unused imports after OnboardingBadge extraction

288c714

mountiny previously approved these changes May 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRow/OnboardingBadge.tsx

Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into refactor/option-row…

6ca8654

…-onboarding-badge # Conflicts: # src/components/LHNOptionsList/OptionRowLHN/OptionRowLHNCore.tsx

docs: add JSDoc to OnboardingBadgeProps

f3b15b2

BartekObudzinski dismissed mountiny’s stale review via f3b15b2 May 12, 2026 08:06

mountiny approved these changes May 12, 2026

View reviewed changes

mountiny merged commit fcf3f8d into Expensify:main May 12, 2026
52 of 74 checks passed

melvin-bot Bot added the Emergency label May 12, 2026

mountiny removed the Emergency label May 12, 2026

OSBotify mentioned this pull request May 13, 2026

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2026-05-13 #90410

Closed

82 tasks

melvin-bot Bot mentioned this pull request May 13, 2026

[Due for payment 2026-05-20] [No QA] refactor: OptionRowLHN — OnboardingBadge subcomponent #89954

Closed

Conversation

BartekObudzinski commented May 7, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented May 7, 2026 • edited by github-actions Bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

BartekObudzinski commented May 8, 2026

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented May 8, 2026

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented May 8, 2026

Uh oh!

DylanDylann commented May 11, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

Uh oh!

srikarparsi commented May 11, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented May 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

melvin-bot Bot commented May 12, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented May 12, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 12, 2026

Uh oh!

mountiny commented May 12, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

MelvinBot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

OSBotify commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

BartekObudzinski commented May 7, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented May 7, 2026 •

edited by github-actions Bot

Loading