Skip to content

Made the text content of chat message accessible in iOS#81663

Open
Uzaifm127 wants to merge 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
Uzaifm127:fix/80203-Remove-accessibilityLabel-for-iOS
Open

Made the text content of chat message accessible in iOS#81663
Uzaifm127 wants to merge 1 commit intoExpensify:mainfrom
Uzaifm127:fix/80203-Remove-accessibilityLabel-for-iOS

Conversation

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Contributor

@Uzaifm127 Uzaifm127 commented Feb 6, 2026

Explanation of Change

Made the parent element non-accessible of chat message in iOS

Fixed Issues

$ #80203
PROPOSAL: #80203 (comment)

Tests

Precondition: Enable the VoiceOver on iOS.

  1. Launch Expensify app.
  2. Open any chat with link or text in the message.
  3. Verify that the link or text in the message is accessible by screen reader and user can navigate to it using VoiceOver.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Test

QA Steps

Same as Test

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

iOS-native.mov
Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@Pujan92 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from a team and pecanoro and removed request for a team February 6, 2026 10:10
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2026

@pecanoro Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@@ -2042,6 +2043,8 @@ function PureReportActionItem({
);
};

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-1 (docs)

Platform-specific logic is being added directly within the component body. This creates a hardcoded platform-specific value that increases maintenance overhead and complexity.

Suggested fix: Separate this concern through platform-specific file extensions:

// PureReportActionItem.ios.tsx
const ACCESSIBLE_PROP = false;

// PureReportActionItem.tsx (or .android.tsx, .web.tsx)
const ACCESSIBLE_PROP = true;

// Then in the component:
<PressableWithSecondaryInteraction
    accessible={ACCESSIBLE_PROP}
    ...
/>

Alternatively, if this is a fundamental accessibility difference, consider making PressableWithSecondaryInteraction handle this internally with platform-specific files rather than exposing it to every consumer.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: d531da1c89

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 2066 to +2069
preventDefaultContextMenu={draftMessage === undefined && !hasErrors}
withoutFocusOnSecondaryInteraction
accessibilityLabel={translate('accessibilityHints.chatMessage')}
accessible
accessible={!isIOSNative}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve VoiceOver access to message actions on iOS

On iOS native, setting the message container accessible={false} removes the only accessibility node that exposes onPress and onSecondaryInteraction for many report actions (e.g., plain-text messages that only render Text fragments). In that case VoiceOver focus moves to the text nodes, which don't have handlers, so users can no longer activate the message or open the context menu (copy/reply/react) via accessibility. This regression only appears for iOS VoiceOver users and for messages without other interactive children; consider keeping the container accessible or gating it only when a focused child with its own handlers exists.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Pujan92 @pecanoro

We aren't adding accessibilityHint and changing accessibilityLabel as per the proposal because setting only accessible to false for iOS will be enough to solve the issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@joekaufmanexpensify joekaufmanexpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine from a product perspective

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants