Skip to content

Added correct announcements for Language picker on native platforms#81013

Merged
cristipaval merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Uzaifm127:fix/79866-language-picker-announcements-on-native-platforms
Feb 24, 2026
Merged

Added correct announcements for Language picker on native platforms#81013
cristipaval merged 10 commits intoExpensify:mainfrom
Uzaifm127:fix/79866-language-picker-announcements-on-native-platforms

Conversation

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Uzaifm127 Uzaifm127 commented Jan 30, 2026

Explanation of Change

  1. Added the correct announcement for Language picker.
  2. Added the announcement and role to Done button in iOS for Language picker.

Fixed Issues

$ #77534
$ #77541
$ #77546
$ #79866
PROPOSAL: #79866 (comment)

Tests

Precondition for Test 1 and Test 2: You must be logged out.

Test 1: Incorrect announcement for language picker - #77541

  1. Using Android TalkBack, open the Expensify app.
  2. Swipe right to focus to the 'Language' picker at the bottom of the page.
  3. Verify that the Talkback announces Collapsed, Language, combobox correctly when focused on Language picker.

Test 2: Done button in iOS - #77534 and #77546

  1. Using iOS VoiceOver, open the Expensify app
  2. Swipe to the 'Language' dropdown button and double-tap to activate
  3. Swipe to the 'Done' button in the picker view
  4. Verify that the Button is announced with button role.
  5. Swipe once left
  6. Verify that the focused control is announced with a button role and descriptive name as 'Dismiss'.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

// TODO: These must be filled out, or the issue title must include "[No QA]."

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
language-picker-android-native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/Picker/BasePicker.tsx 53.94% <ø> (ø)
... and 22 files with indirect coverage changes

@Uzaifm127 Uzaifm127 marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2026 17:21
@Uzaifm127 Uzaifm127 requested review from a team as code owners January 30, 2026 17:21
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from dominictb and trjExpensify and removed request for a team January 30, 2026 17:21
@melvin-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

melvin-bot Bot commented Jan 30, 2026

@dominictb Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Comment thread src/components/Picker/BasePicker.tsx Outdated
touchableWrapperProps={{
accessible: true,
accessibilityRole: CONST.ROLE.COMBOBOX,
accessibilityLabel: translate('languagePage.language'),
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The accessibility label translate('languagePage.language') is hardcoded specifically for the language picker, but BasePicker is a generic component used throughout the app for many different purposes (taxes, reports, distance rates, custom fields, etc.).

Suggested fix:

Add an optional accessibilityLabel prop to BasePickerProps and pass it from the parent component:

// In BasePicker.tsx
type BasePickerProps<TPickerValue> = {
    // ... existing props
    accessibilityLabel?: string;
};

// Use it in touchableWrapperProps
touchableWrapperProps={{
    accessible: true,
    accessibilityRole: CONST.ROLE.COMBOBOX,
    accessibilityLabel: accessibilityLabel ?? label, // Use prop or fall back to label
    accessibilityState: {disabled: isDisabled, expanded: isHighlighted},
}}

Then in LocalePicker.tsx, pass the specific label:

<Picker
    accessibilityLabel={translate('languagePage.language')}
    // ... other props
/>

This keeps BasePicker generic and reusable while allowing each usage to specify its own appropriate accessibility label.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

importantForAccessibility: 'no-hide-descendants',
}}
touchableDoneProps={{
accessibilityRole: CONST.ROLE.BUTTON,
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ CONSISTENCY-2 (docs)

The accessibility label for the Done button uses translate('common.dismiss'), but this might not be appropriate for all contexts where BasePicker is used. For example, when selecting a tax rate or currency, "Dismiss" might not accurately describe the action (which is more like "Done" or "Confirm Selection").

Suggested fix:

Add an optional doneButtonAccessibilityLabel prop to allow customization:

type BasePickerProps<TPickerValue> = {
    // ... existing props
    doneButtonAccessibilityLabel?: string;
};

// In touchableDoneProps
touchableDoneProps={{
    accessibilityRole: CONST.ROLE.BUTTON,
    accessibilityLabel: doneButtonAccessibilityLabel ?? translate('common.dismiss'),
}}

This allows parent components to provide context-specific labels when needed while maintaining a sensible default.


Please rate this suggestion with 👍 or 👎 to help us improve! Reactions are used to monitor reviewer efficiency.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Uzaifm127 Can you take a look at this comment?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This comment is not relevant now because I removed the accessibilityLabel from touchableDoneProps in this commit.

I mentioned here why dismiss isn't required in touchableDoneProps.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 8157ce068d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +215 to +219
touchableWrapperProps={{
accessible: true,
accessibilityRole: CONST.ROLE.COMBOBOX,
accessibilityLabel: translate('languagePage.language'),
accessibilityState: {disabled: isDisabled, expanded: isHighlighted},
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Avoid hardcoding language label for all pickers

BasePicker is the shared implementation for all pickers (via src/components/Picker/index*.tsx), so hardcoding touchableWrapperProps.accessibilityLabel to translate('languagePage.language') will make every native picker announce itself as “Language” (e.g., currency, time zone, category). This is an accessibility regression outside the language screen and will mislead screen readers. Consider passing a label prop down from the caller or conditionally setting the label only for the language picker.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

trjExpensify
trjExpensify previously approved these changes Jan 31, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify trjExpensify left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Part of the accessibility project.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I will take over here

@Uzaifm127

This comment was marked as resolved.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll pick this one as discussed here.

@cristipaval cristipaval requested review from mananjadhav and removed request for shubham1206agra February 3, 2026 17:40
@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Added the codex suggestions. I'll go deeper into third subissue tomorrow.

You can review the first two sub issues now.

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Uzaifm127 commented Feb 11, 2026

@cristipaval Please re run the adhoc build, I merged the latest main into this branch after a minute you ran the build, there is a script on the latest main which wasn't there in this branch.

@mananjadhav The failing checks seems unrelated to this PR, can you confirm?

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @cristipaval has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Uzaifm127 Can you sync latest main to see if it fixes it?

…6-language-picker-announcements-on-native-platforms
@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav If you meant the adhoc build failure then it is resolved.

Merged the latest main.

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Bump for updates on this

@rushatgabhane
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

rushatgabhane commented Feb 18, 2026

@mananjadhav can you please prioritize this? this PR is quite old 😅

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I was out yesterday but I'll finish it today.

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Bump for updates on this.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I just downloaded the adhoc build and testing it on my physical device.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Feb 24, 2026

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android-languag-picker.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
ios-language-picker-announcement.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari-languag-picker-announcement.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web-languag-picker-voice-over.mov

…6-language-picker-announcements-on-native-platforms
@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I should have access to the Android tablet in an hour. Will finish the checklist then.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I am trying to test this on Android tablet. With the talkback enabled, I am unable to click on the language picket at all. I’ll try to test it once more.

Screenrecorder-2026-02-24-16-33-36-2.mp4

@Uzaifm127
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav

The adhoc build on android is working fine from my side, I've tested the adhoc build on Android and language picker is selecting.

Screenrecording_20260224_171222.1.mp4

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Please ignore it was an issue with my tablet. It didn't select even when the TalkBack was off and prod version.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@mananjadhav mananjadhav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have issues with my Android chrome.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from cristipaval February 24, 2026 16:15
@cristipaval cristipaval merged commit 0431149 into Expensify:main Feb 24, 2026
30 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @cristipaval has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/cristipaval in version: 9.3.26-0 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 9.3.26-8 🚀

platform result
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants