Skip to content

Fix the tappable nested rows on group by results on mobile.#76608

Merged
JS00001 merged 12 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
Krishna2323:krishna2323/issue/76129-2
Dec 12, 2025
Merged

Fix the tappable nested rows on group by results on mobile.#76608
JS00001 merged 12 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
Krishna2323:krishna2323/issue/76129-2

Conversation

@Krishna2323

@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 commented Dec 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #76129
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Pre-requisite: Mobile-only

  1. Create a workspace
  2. Create two expenses
  3. Submit the report
  4. Go to Reports > Accounting > Unapproved cash
  5. Expand the group
  6. Click on a transaction item > Verify the transaction details page is opened
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  • Requires internet

QA Steps

  • Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android_native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android_chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
ios_native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios_safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web_chrome.mp4

Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Dec 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Looks like you've decreased code coverage for some files. Please write tests to increase, or at least maintain, the existing level of code coverage. See our documentation here for how to interpret this table.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx 87.20% <100.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
...stWithSections/Search/TransactionGroupListItem.tsx 71.69% <33.33%> (-1.12%) ⬇️
...thSections/Search/TransactionGroupListExpanded.tsx 54.45% <38.09%> (-2.53%) ⬇️
... and 30 files with indirect coverage changes

@JS00001 JS00001 requested review from JS00001 and getusha December 5, 2025 19:54
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2025 20:40
@Krishna2323 Krishna2323 requested review from a team as code owners December 5, 2025 20:40
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from MarioExpensify and heyjennahay and removed request for a team December 5, 2025 20:40
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@MarioExpensify Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

hoverStyle={[!transaction.isDisabled && styles.hoveredComponentBG]}
dataSet={{[CONST.SELECTION_SCRAPER_HIDDEN_ELEMENT]: true, [CONST.INNER_BOX_SHADOW_ELEMENT]: false}}
id={transaction.transactionID}
>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-4 (docs)

Inside the .map() callback (line 192), new arrow function instances are created on every iteration for onPress and onLongPress. React uses referential equality to determine if props changed, so these new function instances on every render trigger unnecessary re-renders of the PressableWithFeedback component.

Suggested fix: Memoize the callbacks with useCallback:

const handleOnPressCallback = useCallback(
    (transaction: TransactionListItemType) => () => handleOnPress(transaction),
    [handleOnPress]
);

const handleOnLongPressCallback = useCallback(
    (transaction: TransactionListItemType) => () => onLongPress?.(transaction),
    [onLongPress]
);

// Then in the map:
<PressableWithFeedback
    onPress={handleOnPressCallback(transaction)}
    onLongPress={handleOnLongPressCallback(transaction)}
    // ... other props
>

Or alternatively, pass the transaction via a data attribute and use a single memoized handler.

@dubielzyk-expensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why is tapping on the expense closing the group/report? Shouldn't it open the expense?

The select mode part looks good though

@trjExpensify

trjExpensify commented Dec 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@getusha has moved to the backend contributors team, so we can probably have an frontend C+ take the review of this. @jayeshmangwani you're back from OOO. Do you have the bandwidth to prioritise this one today or tomorrow?

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify, sure. I can handle this as C+ and will review it today.

@trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you!

@trjExpensify trjExpensify requested review from jayeshmangwani and removed request for getusha December 8, 2025 12:33
@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Why is tapping on the expense closing the group/report? Shouldn't it open the expense?

@Krishna2323 🆙

@Krishna2323

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jayeshmangwani #76129 (comment)

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 I’m encountering a bug on iOS and want to check if you can reproduce it:

  1. Navigate to Reports -> Unapproved Cash
  2. Long-press a grouped report and tap Select, this selects all associated child reports
  3. Expand the child reports
  4. Tap any child report
selection-bug.mov

Expected: Only that specific child report becomes unselected.

Actual: All selected reports are unselected.

@Krishna2323

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jayeshmangwani fixed both issues.

@JS00001

JS00001 commented Dec 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jayeshmangwani Can you please re-review?

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Yes, sure. checking now.

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323, I’m seeing an issue with the selection. Try selecting 3 report groups, and then select a few others, For me selection stops working after the third one.

selection-bug-1.mov

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

And BTW, the caret is missing in the row in the latest code.
Simulator Screenshot - iPhone 16 - 2025-12-10 at 22 05 07

@dannymcclain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

And BTW, the caret is missing in the row in the latest code.

If you're talking about the expense rows that you see once you expand a report on mobile, I believe that is expected.

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

If you're talking about the expense rows that you see once you expand a report on mobile, I believe that is expected.

Yes, I’m talking about the expense rows after they expand, but we now need to add the caret as mentioned in this comment #76129 (comment).

@dannymcclain

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ah yes you're right! My bad, sorry about that.

@trjExpensify trjExpensify mentioned this pull request Dec 10, 2025
53 tasks
@Krishna2323

Krishna2323 commented Dec 11, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Try selecting 3 report groups, and then select a few others. For me, selection stops working after the third one.

@jayeshmangwani this happens only when selecting reports that don’t have their transactions loaded. This also happens on main.

And BTW, the caret is missing in the row in the latest code.

I’ve fixed this — a prop was accidentally removed while resolving conflicts.

Monosnap.screencast.2025-12-11.14-39-29.mp4

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JS00001 @MarioExpensify This issue #76608 (comment) happens on the main as well, so I think we can report it and create a new issue for it.

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I’ve fixed this — a prop was accidentally removed while resolving conflicts.

@Krishna2323 , can you push the latest code? I still can’t see the caret in the newest version.

Comment thread src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx Outdated
Comment thread src/components/TransactionItemRow/index.tsx Outdated
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: krishna2323 <belivethatkg@gmail.com>
@Krishna2323

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

can you push the latest code?

Sorry, I forgot to push the commit — it’s updated now.

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mweb-chrome.mov
iOS: HybridApp
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

@jayeshmangwani jayeshmangwani left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@jayeshmangwani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Krishna2323 please select I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on: on checklist

@JS00001 JS00001 merged commit 19dc324 into Expensify:main Dec 12, 2025
34 of 35 checks passed
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/JS00001 in version: 9.2.78-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.2.78-8 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants