Skip to content

Introduce blocking modal when user tries to create a workspace from restricted domains group#76094

Merged
chuckdries merged 8 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
twilight2294:issue73864
Dec 8, 2025
Merged

Introduce blocking modal when user tries to create a workspace from restricted domains group#76094
chuckdries merged 8 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
twilight2294:issue73864

Conversation

@twilight2294

@twilight2294 twilight2294 commented Nov 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ #73864
PROPOSAL: #73864 (comment)

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Precondition:

  • Account is restricted from creating workspace (configured on OD)
  • Account does not have workspace

If you don't have precondition 1, then you can simply paste the following snippet in console, just replace the domain with the account domain you are logged in with:

Onyx.merge('myDomainSecurityGroups', {'<YOUR_DOMAIN>': '123'});
Onyx.merge('securityGroup_123', {enableRestrictedPolicyCreation: true});
  1. Open 1:1 DM
  2. Click + > Track distance > Manual
  3. Enter amount > Next
  4. On confirm page, click Rate
  5. Click Upgrade

Verify that you see the blocking modal:

Screenshot 2025-11-26 at 11 37 33 AM
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If new assets were added or existing ones were modified, I verified that:
    • The assets are optimized and compressed (for SVG files, run npm run compress-svg)
    • The assets load correctly across all supported platforms.
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hey, I noticed you changed src/languages/en.ts in a PR from a fork. For security reasons, translations are not generated automatically for PRs from forks.

If you want to automatically generate translations for other locales, an Expensify employee will have to:

  1. Look at the code and make sure there are no malicious changes.
  2. Run the Generate static translations GitHub workflow. If you have write access and the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Alternatively, if you are an external contributor, you can run the translation script locally with your own OpenAI API key. To learn more, try running:

npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --help

Typically, you'd want to translate only what you changed by running npx ts-node ./scripts/generateTranslations.ts --compare-ref main

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from situchan November 26, 2025 05:58
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested review from heyjennahay and removed request for a team November 26, 2025 05:58
Comment thread src/languages/es.ts Outdated
draft: 'Borrador',
finished: 'Finalizados',
upgrade: 'Mejora',
upgradeWorkspaceWarning: 'No se puede actualizar el espacio de trabajo',

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<ConfirmModal
isVisible={isUpgradeWarningModalOpen}
shouldShowCancelButton={false}
onConfirm={() => setIsUpgradeWarningModalOpen(false)}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ PERF-4 (docs)

Creating a new arrow function on every render causes ConfirmModal to receive a new function reference each time, potentially triggering unnecessary re-renders even when the modal's visibility hasn't changed.

Suggested fix: Use useCallback to memoize the function:

const handleConfirmUpgradeWarning = useCallback(() => {
    setIsUpgradeWarningModalOpen(false);
}, []);

// Then in the JSX:
<ConfirmModal
    isVisible={isUpgradeWarningModalOpen}
    shouldShowCancelButton={false}
    onConfirm={handleConfirmUpgradeWarning}
   
    prompt={translate('common.upgradeWorkspaceWarningForRestrictedPolicyCreationPrompt')}
    confirmText={translate('common.buttonConfirm')}
/>

@twilight2294

twilight2294 commented Nov 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@situchan @trjExpensify can you please confirm the expected behaviour after got it is clicked :

Currently it stays on the upgrade modal page, do you want it to navigate to the distance confirmation screen?:

Screen.Recording.2025-11-26.at.11.30.51.AM.mov

Also @situchan to test this you can use this snippet and paste it in console:

Onyx.merge('myDomainSecurityGroups', {'<YOUR_DOMAIN>': '123'});
Onyx.merge('securityGroup_123', {enableRestrictedPolicyCreation: true});

I will upload platform recordings once expected behaviour is cleared out

Comment thread src/languages/en.ts Outdated
draft: 'Draft',
finished: 'Finished',
upgrade: 'Upgrade',
upgradeWorkspaceWarning: `Can't upgrade workspace`,

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...c/pages/iou/request/step/IOURequestStepUpgrade.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

@trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Currently it stays on the upgrade modal page, do you want it to navigate to the distance confirmation screen?:

I don't think the auto-navigation is super intuitive, they can return with the < caret.

@situchan

situchan commented Nov 28, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I will upload platform recordings once expected behaviour is cleared out

The video attached in #76094 (comment) looks good.
This behavior is also consistent with workspace downgrade blocking modal

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@trjExpensify we automatically dismiss modal when downgrade workspace:
Shouldn't they be consistent?

Screen.Recording.2025-11-28.at.11.33.37.PM.mov

@trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The action was successful in that case, wasn't it? This is blocking the action.

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The action was successful in that case, wasn't it? This is blocking the action.

The action was unsuccessful. As seen in video, policy plan type is still Control

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I am also a fan of staying on the upgrade modal page, not auto-navigation. But just asking for the purpose of consistency.

@trjExpensify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Ohhhhh, I see. I missed that. I would vote to keep them on the page in both cases of being unsuccessful. 👍

@twilight2294

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@situchan i guess you can now continue with your review

@situchan

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@twilight2294 please add screenshots. merge main

@situchan

situchan commented Nov 30, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: HybridApp
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
msafari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov

Comment thread src/languages/en.ts Outdated
Comment on lines +597 to +598
upgradeWorkspaceWarning: `Can't upgrade workspace`,
upgradeWorkspaceWarningForRestrictedPolicyCreationPrompt: 'Your company has restricted workspace creation. Please reach out to an admin for help.',

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not the right fit to add these in common section. Maybe move to workspace.upgrade.commonFeatures

Comment on lines +136 to +139
if (isRestrictedPolicyCreation) {
setIsUpgradeWarningModalOpen(true);
return;
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be called before

if (isCategorizing || isReporting) {
setShowConfirmationForm(true);
return;
}

@twilight2294

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looking at the comments

@twilight2294

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@twilight2294 please add screenshots. merge main

this too

@twilight2294 twilight2294 requested a review from situchan December 4, 2025 11:08
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from chuckdries December 4, 2025 11:13
chuckdries
chuckdries previously approved these changes Dec 4, 2025

@chuckdries chuckdries left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works like a charm!

Image

@chuckdries

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@twilight2294 sorry for the delay reviewing this! Looks like you need to merge main

@twilight2294

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@chuckdries all yours 😄

@chuckdries

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@twilight2294 conflicts again 😭

@twilight2294

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

:(, hopefully we don't have any failures now 🤞

@chuckdries chuckdries merged commit 3e6e6c9 into Expensify:main Dec 8, 2025
31 checks passed
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Dec 9, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/chuckdries in version: 9.2.74-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.2.74-12 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

1 similar comment
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.2.74-12 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.2.74-12 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants