Skip to content

fix(perf): move useOnyx call up the tree on LHN#64076

Merged
mountiny merged 3 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:fix/lhn-props
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

fix(perf): move useOnyx call up the tree on LHN#64076
mountiny merged 3 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
callstack-internal:fix/lhn-props

Conversation

@adhorodyski

@adhorodyski adhorodyski commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mountiny

Explanation of Change

This PR moves useOnyx connections from within render items of LHN up the tree to the list level. This lets the CPU breathe more while maintaining the very same behaviour and data.
A reattempt after #63362 got reverted.

Fixed Issues

$ #63439
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Create fresh account
  2. Start chat with a random user and send a message
  3. Go back to LHN and verify the chat is on the top of the list
  4. Long press/Right click on Concierge chat and select "Pin"
  5. Verify the Concierge chat went to the top of the list
  6. Start another chat
  7. Create a task and assign it to yourself
  8. Verify that chat went to the 1st or 2nd position in the LHN (it would be sorted alphabetically together with Concierge)
  9. Go to Account -> Preferences
  10. Change the Priority Mode to Focus
  11. Go back to LHN
  12. Verify the only visible chats are Pinned chat and the one where you assigned the task with GBR
  13. Go to Account -> Preferences
  14. Change the Priority Mode to Most Recent
  15. Go back to LHN
  16. Verify all three reports are visible

In addition, QA steps from this deploy blocker apply: #63811

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@adhorodyski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Looking for a solution to #63811 now.

@adhorodyski

adhorodyski commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Opening for review, done with testing under #63811 (comment)

@adhorodyski adhorodyski marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2025 16:21
@adhorodyski adhorodyski requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2025 16:21
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from brunovjk June 12, 2025 16:22
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@brunovjk Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team June 12, 2025 16:22
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@Expensify Expensify deleted a comment from github-actions Bot Jun 12, 2025
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #64076.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/64076/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/64076/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/64076/NewExpensify.dmg https://64076.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@adhorodyski asked for the restest but please add the test steps to the pr body

@adhorodyski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Just updated, sorry! I figured we can use the same steps as one of @TMisiukiewicz's recent PR.

@adhorodyski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Backlinking, it's no longer reproducible by the QA team: #63811 (comment)

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brunovjk can you please complete the review and testing? thanks!

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sure :D

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I can still reproduce this bug in our PR @adhorodyski:

Screen.Recording.2025-06-13.at.13.01.18.mov

@adhorodyski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Huh that's tricky then, I'll rerun it way more times now and see what's the dependency there. It was just fine this morning for 3-4 tries.

@adhorodyski

adhorodyski commented Jun 16, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

iOS: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4bffa0a4-5cea-4e0e-addb-f93aa7dbdbf2

Android: https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72e3feb2-d459-4b24-9e77-2684ef1dbc28

Cannot reproduce now on iOS, doing Web next.

Update: Android is working fine.

@adhorodyski

adhorodyski commented Jun 16, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@brunovjk managed to fix this here, updated the PR. Can I ask you for a retest, also from the performance standpoint? Looks like I had to add one render back.

For some reason it was only a wide layout problem - worked fine even on the narrow web. isReportsSplitNavigatorLast needs to be also passed down the list's extraData, even though it's a dependency for renderItem. I already have this general issue on my radar with @TMisiukiewicz because it's the case for other props as well.

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Very good @adhorodyski we fixed the bug. I compared our PR with the app in production and everything is consistent, but there are two details:

  1. Step 3 does not happen, when creating a new chat, it appears below the Concierge:
MacOS: Chrome / Safari - This PR
Screen.Recording.2025-06-17.at.13.26.12.mov
  1. I found another bug, where the chat containing the completed task does not appear after returning from "Mode to Focus" to "Most Recent":
MacOS: Chrome / Safari - This PR
our_PR.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari - Production
prod.mov

However, both are also reproducible in the app in production, so I believe we are good to go here. I will continue testing on the other platforms and complete the checklist. What do you think @adhorodyski? Thanks.

@adhorodyski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This looks good! I'll also restest this myself today from React's performance perspective.

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp
Android: mWeb Chrome
64076_android_web.mov
iOS: HybridApp
64076_ios_native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
64076_ios_web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
64076_web_chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@brunovjk brunovjk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tested this PR alongside new.expensify.com, and everything appears consistent to me. However, I noticed that the following bugs are reproducible in both versions:

  1. The tooltip in the Concierge chat does not appear immediately when logging in with a new account:

    MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    Screen.Recording.2025-06-18.at.11.48.02.mov
  2. A 1:1 chat with a completed task will disappear from the LHN when switching from "Focus Mode" back to "Most Recent" mode:

    MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    Screen.Recording.2025-06-18.at.11.51.35.mov

Correct me if I’m wrong, but this PR is intended to improve performance only, without changing any existing app functionality. Maybe we should update the “Test Steps” here accordingly, so that the QA team doesn't get confused with the existing bugs. What do you think @adhorodyski?

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from mountiny June 18, 2025 15:08
@adhorodyski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Yup, I think I got them wrong in the first place. cc @TMisiukiewicz I'll remove these mentioned steps now.

@mountiny

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@brunovjk those bugs you found, if that is present on main, can you please raise them in bugs channel? Or where did the expected behaviour come from?

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same as last time with one additional commit, looks good to me

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 1b91363 into Expensify:main Jun 18, 2025
19 checks passed
@OSBotify

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.69-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.69-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.69-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/lakchote in version: 9.1.69-3 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants