Skip to content

Add const / permissions function for help side panel beta#59221

Merged
francoisl merged 5 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:side-pane-feature-flag
Apr 2, 2025
Merged

Add const / permissions function for help side panel beta#59221
francoisl merged 5 commits into
Expensify:mainfrom
software-mansion-labs:side-pane-feature-flag

Conversation

@blazejkustra

@blazejkustra blazejkustra commented Mar 27, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Explanation of Change

Add a function canUseHelpSidePanel() for the usePermissions() hook, that we can use to check if a user should see the help panel button. There was a bug that caused users on production to see the button at some point, so we thought it might be safer to use a beta instead.

Fixed Issues

N/A Part of #56988

Tests

  1. Sign in with an account that's part of the beta newDotHelpSidePanel, or part of all betas
  2. Make sure you can see the help panel button in the top right corner
  3. Sign out, sign in again with an account
  4. Make sure you do not see the help panel button in the top right corner

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

  1. Sign in on staging with an *expensifail.com account
  2. Make sure you can see the help button in the top right corner of the screen
  3. Sign out, sign in with a gmail account or any other private domain
  4. Make sure you cannot see the help button in the top right corner of the screen

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@francoisl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Oh nice, I guess I can close #58751 if we go ahead with this then?

@blazejkustra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Oh nice, I guess I can close #58751 if we go ahead with this then?

Yes please!

@blazejkustra blazejkustra marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 07:48
@blazejkustra blazejkustra requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2025 07:48
@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot requested a review from carlosmiceli March 31, 2025 07:49
@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Mar 31, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@carlosmiceli Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot Bot removed the request for review from a team March 31, 2025 07:49
@blazejkustra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@carlosmiceli I think you can ignore this PR, @francoisl has context and will likely review it!

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@blazejkustra Using an account with beta permissions, when setting the object to null Onyx.set('nvp_sidePanel', null), the help button does not disappear, we just cannot open the panel, was this expected? Thanks.

Screen.Recording.2025-03-31.at.11.04.56.mov

Comment thread src/hooks/useSidePane.ts
const {isExtraLargeScreenWidth, shouldUseNarrowLayout} = useResponsiveLayout();
const [sidePaneNVP] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_SIDE_PANE);
const [language] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.NVP_PREFERRED_LOCALE);
const [canUseHelpSidePanel = false] = useOnyx(ONYXKEYS.BETAS, {selector: (betas) => !!betas?.includes(CONST.BETAS.HELP_SIDE_PANEL)});

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder why we don't use usePermissions() here? Thanks.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know why but usePermissions was breaking GH checks here

Comment thread src/hooks/useSidePane.ts Outdated
const isSidePaneHiddenOrLargeScreen = !isSidePaneVisible || isLanguageUnsupported || isExtraLargeScreenWidth || !canUseHelpSidePanel;

// The help button is hidden when:
// - side pane nvp is not set

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, do we need to update this comment like we did in the other PR.?

cc: @francoisl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done 👌

@blazejkustra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

the help button does not disappear, we just cannot open the panel, was this expected? Thanks.

No it wasn't.. Great find @brunovjk! Fixed in the latest commit

@brunovjk

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Great @blazejkustra, I have to go now, I will complete the checklist by the end of the day.

@francoisl francoisl self-requested a review March 31, 2025 20:56
@blazejkustra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Great @blazejkustra, I have to go now, I will complete the checklist by the end of the day.

@brunovjk Any updates?

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Apr 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Sorry, I was dealing with the deploy blocker and ran out of time. I'll review it now.

@blazejkustra

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No worries! Thank you 🚀

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Apr 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
59221_android_native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome

Uploading 59221_android_web.mov…

iOS: Native
59221_ios_native.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari

Uploading 59221_ios_web.mov…

MacOS: Chrome / Safari
59221_web_chrome.mov
MacOS: Desktop
59221_web_desktop.mov

@brunovjk brunovjk left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM :D

@melvin-bot

melvin-bot Bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🎯 @brunovjk, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #59447.

@brunovjk

brunovjk commented Apr 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

All yours @francoisl :D

@carlosmiceli

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Oh, lol, just seeing the comments, went straight to review! All yours @francoisl :D

Comment thread src/libs/Permissions.ts
Comment on lines +61 to +63
function canUseHelpSidePanel(betas: OnyxEntry<Beta[]>): boolean {
return !!betas?.includes(CONST.BETAS.HELP_SIDE_PANEL) || canUseAllBetas(betas);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So this isn't used anywhere? If so let's remove it.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have a tracking issue to remove the beta when it's no longer needed anyway, not blocking on this.

@blazejkustra blazejkustra Apr 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ahh, I missed that one 🤦 I should've used this function as the selector of useOnyx. I'll refactor it for Stage 4

@francoisl francoisl merged commit 5f1a121 into Expensify:main Apr 2, 2025
@OSBotify

OSBotify commented Apr 2, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.1.23-1 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@nlemma

nlemma commented Apr 3, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@blazejkustra @brunovjk QA team is not seeing the help button even after using an Expensifail account and running Onyx.set('nvp_sidePanel', {}) or Onyx.set('nvp_sidePanel', null) or Onyx.set('nvp_sidePaneExpanded', null) in the console. Is there any additional step we need to take to be able to see the button?

Screenrecorder-2025-04-03-22-09-25-632.mp4

@francoisl

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@nlemma this is because we need to add accounts to a beta differently for this, it doesn't work on every expensifail account like other betas. I added applausetester+bp0104h@applause.expensifail.com, so it should work from that account now.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.23-7 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

francoisl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
…x key

Revert "Merge pull request #59221 from software-mansion-labs/side-pane-feature-flag"

This reverts commit 5f1a121, reversing
changes made to b8b68af.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants