[Due for payment 2026-05-13] Payment issue for E/App PR#88747

[melvin-bot]

Issue created to compensate the Contributor+ member for their work on #88747
E/E issue linked to the PR - https://www.github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/621231.
Contributor+ member who reviewed the PR - @ahmedGaber93.

Wait 7 days after the PR is deployed to production before issuing payment in case there are regressions.

Issue Owner

Current Issue Owner: @mallenexpensify

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @mallenexpensify (Awaiting Payment)

[ahmedGaber93]

I don’t think we need a regression test here due to the complexity of the test steps, since it requires redirecting the Concierge/admin chat from the bot to a human.

[melvin-bot]

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

• Reviewer: @ahmedGaber93 owed $250 via NewDot

BugZero Checklist (@mallenexpensify)

• (if NewFeature) I have created a PR for any necessary HelpDot updates, or I confirmed no updates are necessary.
• I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the necessary manual offers
• I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
• I have verified the PR was not reverted
• I have applied any discounts due to bugs/regressions introduced by this PR
• I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
• I have verified the payment summary above is correct

[mallenexpensify]

Payment Summary

Contributor+: @ahmedGaber93 due $250 via NewDot

@ahmedGaber93 plz complete the BZ checklist and tag me in a post once you have. Thx

[ahmedGaber93]

BugZero Checklist:

• [Contributor] The offending PR and associated issue have been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake.

  Link to the comment on the PR: Improve UX behaviour of Concierge thinking indicator #78134 (comment)
  Link to the comment on the Issue: N/A. I don't have access to the linked issue.

• [Contributor] If the regression was CRITICAL (e.g. interrupts a core flow) A discussion in #expensify-open-source has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner.

  Link to discussion: N/A

• [Contributor] If it was decided to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps using the template below to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

I don’t think we need a regression test here due to the complexity of the test steps, since it requires redirecting the Concierge/admin chat from the bot to a human.