IOU - Category page renders slowly

[lanitochka17]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 1.4.24-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
**Reproducible in production?:**N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

1. Navigate to Workspace report
2. Click on '+' > click on 'Request money' > click on 'Distance' tab
3. Enter start & finish point > click on 'Next' > click on 'Category'

Expected Result:

Category page should render fast

Actual Result:

Category page renders slowly

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

• Android: Native
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Native
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6337801_1704899626906.Screen_Recording_2024-01-10_at_2.07.13_in_the_afternoon.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

[github-actions]

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
3. Fix the issue yourself.

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @flodnv (Engineering), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4319 for more details.

[flodnv]

Weird, pinged 2 people on Slack: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1704902763223599?thread_ts=1704902334.122429&cid=C01GTK53T8Q

[flodnv]

It was caused by #31354, we're going to revert it

[flodnv]

@mountiny said he's taking over, I would just revert the PR

[mountiny]

I have prepared the revert here #34267

[mountiny]

Asked QA to re test