Skip to content

Fix the docstring for Tracer class#377

Open
AlexanderWells-diamond wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix_tracer_docstring
Open

Fix the docstring for Tracer class#377
AlexanderWells-diamond wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix_tracer_docstring

Conversation

@AlexanderWells-diamond
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AlexanderWells-diamond AlexanderWells-diamond commented May 15, 2026

The current docs for the Tracer class do not render correctly. This fixes that.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved formatting of example documentation for better readability.

Review Change Stack

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 15, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 90593f6f-96c1-4a54-839f-1f4bcb566754

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb03263 and b1a4740.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/fastcs/tracer.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A blank line is inserted in the Tracer class docstring between the example introduction text and the following code block, improving the visual separation of documentation elements. No runtime logic or public APIs are affected.

Docstring Formatting

Layer / File(s) Summary
Tracer docstring blank line
src/fastcs/tracer.py
A blank line is inserted in the Tracer class docstring between the "Example usage in interactive shell:" introduction and the subsequent .. code-block:: python code snippet.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A line break here, a space so clean,
Where code examples now convene,
The docstring breathes with room to spare,
Formatting improved with care! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title directly and clearly summarizes the main change: fixing the Tracer class docstring to resolve rendering issues.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
📝 Generate docstrings
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix_tracer_docstring

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 15, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.24%. Comparing base (fb03263) to head (b1a4740).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #377   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.24%   91.24%           
=======================================
  Files          70       70           
  Lines        2604     2604           
=======================================
  Hits         2376     2376           
  Misses        228      228           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@AlexanderWells-diamond
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I note there was a CI failure on the tests for Python 3.13, but a re-run cleared it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant