This repository was archived by the owner on May 7, 2026. It is now read-only.
Remove Unions#137
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Found the following issue for more detail: swagger-api/swagger-codegen#10011 It has been closed but it is unclear to me what the fix is. For now I will just avoid using Unions in models altogether. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the last release, Unions were used in some response models, either directly or indirectly, i.e.
Or,
Swagger codegen has issues with accurately reproducing java client code that contains oneOf or anyOf, which are generated in the openapi schema by these response models. Therefore, I'm removing them.