docs: document mutation annotation AppliesTo in Javadoc#974
Merged
simonresch merged 1 commit intoCodeIntelligenceTesting:mainfrom Oct 13, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Not sure if that could make the Javadoc too verbose though for annotations such as |
simonresch
reviewed
Oct 13, 2025
Contributor
simonresch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like it. 👍 Thanks for the contribution.
The slightly long list of supported types for some annotations is not a big concern IMO. I'm happy to merge this if you add the missing import.
8b590fa to
d76c32f
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Sorry for the missing import, have fixed it now. |
d76c32f to
1907d8d
Compare
simonresch
approved these changes
Oct 13, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This hopefully makes it more obvious to users to which types annotations such as
@InRangeapply (which use@AppliesToto limit the valid target types).What do you think?