[MarketplaceOrdering] New command group az term to accept/show terms

[yungezz]

Description

MarketplaceOrdering RP https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/marketplaceordering/marketplaceagreements, API version 2021-01-01, on Track2 SDK. CodeGen readme config file: https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/pull/12484/files

• az term accept covers term accpeting operation, calling into API PUT https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.MarketplaceOrdering/offerTypes/virtualmachine/publishers/{publisherId}/offers/{offerId}/plans/{planId}/agreements/current?api-version=2021-01-01
• az term show covers term show operation, calling into API GET https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/providers/Microsoft.MarketplaceOrdering/offerTypes/virtualmachine/publishers/{publisherId}/offers/{offerId}/plans/{planId}/agreements/current?api-version=2021-01-01
• offerType is default virtualmachine, this is behavior confirmed with Marketplace team.

Why this is a core module instead of extension?
Terms accepting is a general flow in mgmt plane e2e flow. It's a cross RP operation. Accepting term is a key step during RP registration, user will not able to use RP like LiftR specific commands without terms. Put it in core improving discoverability and availability to users. Secondly, marketplaceordering SDK is already a dependency in core repo from long time ago, this will not impact core package heavily.

Testing Guide

History Notes

[Component Name 1] BREAKING CHANGE: az command a: Make some customer-facing breaking change.
[Component Name 2] az command b: Add some customer-facing feature.

---

This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.

• The PR title and description has followed the guideline in Submitting Pull Requests.

• I adhere to the Command Guidelines.

• I adhere to the Error Handling Guidelines.

[fengzhou-msft]

Should we use az term or az terms? It looks like terms is more common as a command name or option name.

[yungezz]

Should we use az term or az terms? It looks like terms is more common as a command name or option name.

use term to follow existing command group naming convention: single noun like vm, acr, keyvault etc. what's your thought?

[fengzhou-msft]

Should we use az term or az terms? It looks like terms is more common as a command name or option name.

use term to follow existing command group naming convention: single noun like vm, acr, keyvault etc. what's your thought?

Yes, it's more common to have single form noun as command group. I was think that it is more common to say accept terms than accept a term. For command group name, I think both forms are acceptable.

[qwordy]

@yungezz Example name needs to be updated. You might need to add a manual help file.