[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Report - January 22, 2026 #11372
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-01-29T18:15:49.705Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Issues Processed: 10
Labels Applied: 20 total labels
Still Unlabeled: 0 issues
Classification Summary
Label Distribution
Patterns Noticed
Smoke test issues dominant - 7 out of 10 unlabeled issues are automated smoke test reports from different engine runs (Claude, Copilot). These follow a consistent format with test results and pass/fail status.
Parent issues for grouping - 2 issues ([Parent] Issue Arborist - Issue Group #11312, [Parent] Ralph Loop workflow planning #11311) are parent tracking issues created by automated workflows for grouping related sub-issues.
Documentation accuracy - 1 issue (bug: "agent agentic-workflows update" and "agent agentic-workflows upgrade": please update docs #11303) identifies outdated documentation regarding CLI commands, showing user-reported bugs are being flagged.
Recommendations
Auto-label smoke tests - Consider adding automatic labeling logic directly in the smoke test workflow since these follow a predictable pattern and consistently need
testing+automationlabels.Parent issue template - Parent issues created by Issue Arborist and similar workflows could be auto-labeled with
automation+workflowsat creation time.Monitor user-reported issues - Only 1 of 10 unlabeled issues was user-reported. This suggests the auto-triage system is working well for user submissions, but automated workflow-generated issues need better initial labeling.
Success Metrics Update
Auto-Triage Issues workflow run: https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/actions/runs/21259655141
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions