Skip to content

Implement most of bulk memory#976

Merged
fitzgen merged 11 commits into
bytecodealliance:masterfrom
fitzgen:implement-most-of-bulk-memory
Feb 26, 2020
Merged

Implement most of bulk memory#976
fitzgen merged 11 commits into
bytecodealliance:masterfrom
fitzgen:implement-most-of-bulk-memory

Conversation

@fitzgen

@fitzgen fitzgen commented Feb 24, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Felt like a good time to start landing some of this work :)

@fitzgen fitzgen requested a review from alexcrichton February 24, 2020 23:53
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/libcalls.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/libcalls.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/libcalls.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/table.rs
Comment thread tests/wast_testsuites.rs Outdated
@fitzgen

fitzgen commented Feb 25, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@alexcrichton I've addressed all your feedback, do you want to take another look at this?

@fitzgen fitzgen requested a review from alexcrichton February 25, 2020 21:02
@fitzgen fitzgen force-pushed the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch 2 times, most recently from f2d9448 to 8d1b94d Compare February 25, 2020 21:27
Comment thread build.rs Outdated
Comment thread crates/runtime/src/instance.rs Outdated
// we need the incremental writes up to the OOB trap to be visible,
// since this is dictated by the updated spec for the bulk memory
// proposal.
if num_uncopied > 0 {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given WebAssembly/bulk-memory-operations#138 (comment) it sounds like this loop doesn't need to change much here?

@fitzgen fitzgen force-pushed the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch 2 times, most recently from 79c94ae to 7813887 Compare February 26, 2020 21:54
@fitzgen fitzgen force-pushed the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch from 7813887 to 66634cc Compare February 26, 2020 22:39
@fitzgen fitzgen merged commit 76e08d6 into bytecodealliance:master Feb 26, 2020
@fitzgen fitzgen deleted the implement-most-of-bulk-memory branch February 26, 2020 23:08
arkpar pushed a commit to paritytech/wasmtime that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2020
This is a breaking API change: the following settings have been renamed:

- jump_tables_enabled -> enable_jump_tables
- colocated_libcalls -> use_colocated_libcalls
- probestack_enabled -> enable_probestack
- allones_funcaddrs -> emit_all_ones_funcaddrs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants